Legal Opinion

Coryell v. Olmstead

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1918No. 8951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Garfield District Court, Hon. John T. Shumate, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGarrigues, J.

Defendants in error, Olmsted and Kingsbury, commenced this suit November 15,1913, as a'direct attack upon a confessed judgment for $7,809.15, entered against one Fawcett July 22, 1913, in favor of Coryell, plaintiff in error. The purpose of the action was to secure the cancellation of the judgment, enjoin and restrain the sheriff of Garfield County from selling the property of Fawcett on execution, and to procure the appointment of a receiver to take charge of the property.

The Pleadings.

The complaint alleges that June 24, 1913, Kingsbury recovered judgment against Fawcett for $170.40, on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stock-Growers' Bank v. NewtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Sutton v. DanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Walton v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  4. Burr v. ClementSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  5. Sweet v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erjavec v. HerrickColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Roberts v. DietzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  3. Farmers Union Milling & Elevator Co. v. LoveLand Farmers Co-operative Produce Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API