Legal Opinion

Stock-Growers' Bank v. Newton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1889PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Pueblo County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott

The Stock-Growers’ National Bank of Pueblo was plaintiff below, and brought its action in the district court against George A. Newton, alleging in the com- • plaint that a certain warranty deed, executed February 2, 1883, by S. E. Todd, Jr., to said Newton, and also a certain bill of sale, executed at the same time by said S. E. Todd, Jr., and by Todd & Fairchild, to said Newton, were fraudulent and void as against the plaintiff. Said warranty deed purported to convey to said Newton certain real estate, to wit, lots 15 and 16, in block 39, city and county of Pueblo, Colorado, together with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blennerhassett v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Sieber v. FrinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Hager v. ShindlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Hildreth v. SandsNew York Court of Chancery · 1816
  5. Harrison v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mulock v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Rittmaster v. BrisbaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Sutton v. DanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  4. Wood v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  5. Coffee v. EmighSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API