Burr v. Clement
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to County Court of Arapahoe County. The facts are stated, in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The principal question in this case involves the validity of an. assignment made for the benefit of creditors. On the 29th of November, 1880, one David Cairns made an assignment of his effects to the plaintiff in error, Burr, for the benefit of his creditors. The said assignee immediately took possession of the property assigned, the principal portion of which consisted of a stock of goods contained in a store in the city, of Denver, and which merchandise is the subject of the contention in this case. After taking possession of the goods, the plaintiff in error put out his sign as assignee,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dunham v. . WatermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Baldwin v. Peet, Sims & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1859
- Gere v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- Jackson, ex rel. Bigelow v. TimmermanNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Jackson ex dem. Hooker v. MatherNew York Supreme Court · 1827
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lowell Staats Mining Co. v. Pioneer Uravan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Wells v. Schuster-Hax National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
- Curran v. RothschildColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
- Ward v. WigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Roberts v. DietzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.