Technimark, Inc. v. Crellin, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
OSTEEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Technimark, Inc. sued Defendants Crellin, Inc. and Sonoco Products Company, Inc. for patent infringement. Defendants counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment of noninfringement and invalidity of patent, then moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff subsequently dedicated its patent to the public and now moves to dismiss this action as moot. Defendants oppose dismissal of their counterclaim and seek a ruling on their Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, the court will grant Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss on Grounds of Mootness. 1
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Ind-Com Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Laitram Corporation v. Deepsouth Packing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
- W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Oak Materials Group, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- Bioxy, Inc. v. Birko Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- White Mule Co. v. ATC LEASING CO. LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Ciber, Inc. v. CIBER Consulting, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. BindeaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023