Legal Opinion
Bioxy, Inc. v. Birko Corp.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided August 20, 1996No. 5:95-cv-00319PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TERRENCE WILLIAM BOYLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff and counterclaim defendant Bioxy, Inc. (“Bioxy”) owns United States Patent No. 4,880,638 (“the ’638 patent”) for a biocidal chemical used in disinfectants. On April 12, 1995, Bioxy filed this complaint, claiming that two cleaning products manufactured and distributed by the defendants, Dioxy-Chlor and Dura Klor, infringe upon the ’638 patent. On May 31,1995, the defendants answered the complaint by denying the allegations and asserting affirmative defenses of estoppel and invalidity. The defendants further counterclaimed for a declaratory…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Arrowhead Industrial Water, Inc. v. Ecolochem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Bp Chemicals Limited v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Nannette B. Davis v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bragg v. RobertsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Callaway Golf Co. v. SlazengerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc. v. RivenburghDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.