Arevalo v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of sexual assault and aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to confinement for seventy-five years in each case. The Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions, holding that the trial court did not err by submitting the lesser included offense of sexual assault over Appellant’s objection that it was not raised by the evidence. Arevalo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 46 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1996). We granted Appellant’s petition for discretionary review and held that the State is bound by the second prong of the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Aguilar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Schweinle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Arevalo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by38 opinions
- Feldman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Stadt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Ritcherson, Kaitlyn LucretiaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Stadt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.