Legal Opinion

Arevalo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1998No. 316-98PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of sexual assault and aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to confinement for seventy-five years in each case. The Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions, holding that the trial court did not err by submitting the lesser included offense of sexual assault over Appellant’s objection that it was not raised by the evidence. Arevalo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 46 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1996). We granted Appellant’s petition for discretionary review and held that the State is bound by the second prong of the…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Aguilar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Schweinle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Arevalo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by38 opinions

  1. Feldman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Stadt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Ritcherson, Kaitlyn LucretiaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. Stadt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API