Schweinle v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*18 OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
A jury convicted appellant of aggravated kidnapping and assessed his punishment at confinement for fifteen years in the penitentiary. The conviction was affirmed. Schweinle v. State, 893 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1995). We granted discretionary review to determine whether evidence of extraneous offenses and expert testimony regarding “battered woman syndrome” was improperly admitted in the guilt-innocence phase, and whether a lesser included offense was raised by the evidence. Due to our disposition of the latter issue, which is…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Bignall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Charlton v. Board of Attorneys Professional ResponsibilitySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by274 opinions
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Feldman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Arevalo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
269 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.