Legal Opinion

Linker v. Herard

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 17, 1958PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The final order and judgment 'should he affirmed, without costs. By her express agreement, the tenant was barred from asserting and obtaining an adjudication in the instant proceeding of the counterclaims pleaded (Amazon Management Corp. v. Paff, 166 Misc. 438; Stevens v. Nye, 283 App. Div. 666; 3 New York Law of Landlord and Tenant, § 1126; Taylor v. Creary, 5 A D 2d 876). Their dismissal was properly without prejudice to the tenant’s right to bring any other action or proceeding based thereon, if she be so advised (cf. Blumenauer v. Richelson, 219 App. Div. 462).

Concur — Pette, Hart and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Amazon Management Corp. v. PaffAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1938
  2. Blumenauer v. RichelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Stevens v. NyeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. CarrerasCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  2. Orlowsky v. East House Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1961
  3. Cosmopolitan Associates v. OrtegaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1977
  4. Bianchi v. FicorattoCity of New York Municipal Court · 1975
  5. Louis de Boll Iron Works, Ltd. v. Webb & Knapp, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API