Blumenauer v. Richelson

The respondent instituted summary proceedings to remove the appellant who it was claimed was a tenant holding over after due notice to quit. The answer set up an alleged equitable title to the premises in defendant.

The relation of the parties to the premises in question appears to be as follows: The defendant originally owned them and had given a mortgage thereon. This mortgage was foreclosed in December, 1924. On the sale the respondent became the purchaser, receiving the referee’s deed December thirty-first.

The appellant claims that there was an agreement made prior to the sale between…