Orlowsky v. East House Enterprises, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
The lease here provides that rent is payable “ without any set-off or deduction whatsoever ”. Having thus agreed, the tenant could not assert and have the court pass upon its counterclaim in the summary proceeding (Amazon Management. Corp. v. Paff, 166 Misc. 438; Linker v. Herard, 13 Misc 2d 445).
The final order should be modified by reversing the judgment therein in favor of tenant on its counterclaim, and dismissing said counterclaim without prejudice to any other action thereon as tenant may be advised, and as modified affirmed, thereby permitting a recovery to landlord of $315, with $25…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Amazon Management Corp. v. PaffAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1938
- Linker v. HerardAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
3Cited by8 opinions
- Steinberg v. CarrerasCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Haskell v. SuritaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981
- Laub v. Genway Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Middletown Plaza Associates v. Dora Dale of Middletown, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1985
- Dune Deck Owners Corp. v. LiggettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.