Legal Opinion

Smith v. London Assurance Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 24, 1906PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiffs, Arthur W. Smith and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 24th day of April, 1906, granting the defendant’s motion for the appointment of a referee herein.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.:

The plaintiffs complain bn a quantum meruit for services rendered the defendant as professional auditors and accountants in examining the defendant’s books and accounts, reporting thereon and making recommendations in relation thereto over a period from September, 1898, to December, 1903, and for disbursements amount ing to §95.89 incurred in connection therewith, and allege the reasonable worth of such services and disbursements to have been §7,931.59, and that only the sum of $250 had been paid thereon. The answer is in effect a general denial, except that it admits the payment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Feeter v. . ArkenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Thayer v. . McNaughtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Loverin v. Lenox Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pace v. AmendAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Thibaudeau v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. Daly v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. Aronin v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
  5. Franceschi v. District Court of PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API