Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Lattice Semiconductor Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Christopher J. Burke, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG (“Papst” or “Plaintiff’) filed the instant three actions for patent infringement against Defendants Lattice Semiconductor, Corp. (“Lattice”), Xilinx, Inc. (“Xilinx”) and Altera Corporation (“Altera”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Presently pending before the Court are Defendants’ motions to transfer venue to the Northern District of California (“Motions” or “motions to transfer”). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motions are GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
A. The Parties
Plaintiff Papst is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- In Re Genentech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Aylo Freesites Ltd v. DISH Technologies L.L.C.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Aylo Freesites Ltd v. DISH Technologies L.L.C. and Sling TV L.L.C.District Court, D. Utah · 2025
- Bittan v. BBG, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Bruce Bittan, Jack Enright, and Patrick Smith, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated v. BBG, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.