Legal Opinion

Booska v. Hubbard Insurance Agency, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 12, 1993No. 92-067PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Plaintiffs sued their insurance agency, one of its individual agents, and plaintiffs’ fire insurance carrier, following a fire that severely damaged a house they had purchased and were in the process of renovating. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants, and plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

Plaintiffs bought a house in Bristol for $47,500 in 1989. It is undisputed that plaintiff Ora Booska met with Deborah Wheeling, an agent of defendant Hubbard Insurance Agency, Inc., at or near the date of the closing. At that time, according to Booska’s sworn statement, he told…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hill v. GrandeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  4. Rocque v. Co-Op. Fire Ins. Ass'n of Vt.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  5. Washington v. Group Hospitalization, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Fritzeen v. Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. Bushey v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. Larocque v. State Farm InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Murphy v. Patriot Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. Gravel & Shea v. White Current Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API