Legal Opinion

Gravel & Shea v. White Current Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 3, 2000No. 99-083PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant White Current Corp. appeals a Chittenden Superior Court grant of summary judgment to plaintiff law firm Gravel and Shea on the firm’s claim for a contingent fee. Defendant argues that the court erred in concluding that a written fee agreement between plaintiff and defendant and defendant’s post-agreement conduct es-topped defendant from raising preexisting duty and duress defenses. Defendant also contends that the court erred in finding that no material fact remains in dispute as to the amount of recovery subject to the disputed contingency fee. We affirm.

I. Facts

In 1986, defendant,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Samplid Enterprises, Inc. v. First Vermont BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. In Re Margaret Susan P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Fisher v. PooleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Lane v. Town of GraftonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. Booska v. Hubbard Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeVita Subdivision Amendment - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court · 2018
  2. Hamm Mine Act 250 JurisdictionVermont Superior Court · 2008
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. MortonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. MortonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API