Lamb v. Utley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Lapeer; Smith, J. Trover by Clayton J. Lamb and Ernest D. Lamb against Daniel T. Utley. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
To prove their cause of action, the plaintiffs introduced evidence tending to show that they, father and son, owned a quantity of baled timothy mixed (with straw) hay; that the defendant offered them $7 per ton for it, plaintiffs to deliver it f. o. b. car at Dryden, a railroad station distant a few miles from their farm; and that they accepted the offer, with the further agreement that they should load the hay upon their own account; and that the possession and title should remain in the plaintiffs until the hay should be paid for. They also offered evidence tending to show that they…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Empire State Type Founding Co. v. GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Wiggins v. SnowMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Robbins v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Goldsmith v. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Richardson Drug Co. v. TeasdallNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by1 opinion
- Morales v. Michigan Parole Bd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004