Legal Opinion

Maldonado v. Thomson National Press Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 1, 1983PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon special questions, a jury found that the defendant Thomson National Press Company (Thomson) had not been negligent in the design (in 1926) and retrofitting (in 1937) of the platen cutting and creasing press in which the plaintiff hurt his hand. The jury did find, however, that Thomson had negligently failed “adequately [to] warn the potential users of the press of its characteristics and the risks associated with its use.” Finding further that the failure to warn was a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury, the jury assessed damages of $285,000. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Uloth v. City Tank Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  4. Marguerite Jamieson v. Woodward & LothropCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. Farley v. Edward E. Tower Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Taylor v. American Chemistry CouncilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Hanover Insurance v. SuttonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  3. Geshke v. Crocs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  4. Laaperi v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  5. Bavuso v. Caterpillar Industrial, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API