Legal Opinion

State v. Davies

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 6, 2004No. 0205-44469; A118977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals, challenging the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal on one count of disorderly conduct. ORS 166.025(l)(a).1 Defendant argues that, when he pointed and poked at a Safeway employee, after warning that employee not to touch him, he did not engage in behavior proscribed by that statute because he did not use “physical force or physical conduct which is immediately likely to produce the use of such force.” See State v. Cantwell, 66 Or App 848, 853, 676 P2d 353, rev den, 297 Or 124 (1984). We affirm.

A detailed recitation of the underlying facts would be of no benefit to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CantwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. State v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HosleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. WadeMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API