Legal Opinion

Baptist Memorial Hospital v. Johnson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 25, 2009No. Civil Action 02-1919 (PLF)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff hospital brings suit for declaratory and injunctive relief in the nature of mandamus, asking the Court to compel defendant, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) to reopen a final payment decision issued by the Secretary’s payment agent and to recalculate the Secretary’s reimbursement of plaintiff for services it rendered to indigent clients. 2 Three motions are currently before the Court for consideration — defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. FC Investment Group LC v. IFX Markets, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Baptist Memorial Hospital v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. BANNER HEALTH v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. COALITION FOR MERCURY-FREE DRUGS v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Lopes v. Jetsetdc, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Auburn Regional Medical Center v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API