Newton v. Rhoads Bros.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.
Appellants instituted this suit against appellees for damages which they claimed Mrs. Newton had suffered by reason of false detention and a slanderous statement made to her by an empioyé of appellees. She alleged that she went with a friend, Miss Jack, who wanted to examine some platinum mountings, into the jewelry store of appellees ; that after they had looked at the mountings for a few minutes, she (Mrs. Newton) left Miss Jack in the jewelry store and went to a shoe .store to have her shoes shined, and while there she- was, at the instigation of said em-pioyé of appellees, arrested by a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Bolding v. CampTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Duquesne Distributing Co. v. GreenbaumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Meyer v. Monnig Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Young v. North East Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Newton v. Rhoads Bros.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930