Legal Opinion

Newton v. Rhoads Bros.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1930No. 1002—5349PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddx, J.

Plaintiffs in error complain of the holding .of the Court of Civil Appeals [11 S.W.(2d) 377] approving the action of the trial court in peremptorily instructing the jury to return a verdict against them, asserting that the testimony favorable to their cause of action raised an issue of fact which it was proper to submit to the jury.

The question presented requires a brief review of the testimony favorable to the cause of action asserted, which is one for illegally restraining plaintiff in error Mrs. S. A. Newton of her liberty.

The defendants in error owned and operated a jewelry store in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cullen v. DickinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Stevens v. O'NeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Riley v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. A. Harris & Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Riley v. . StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Skillern & Sons, Inc. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. S. H. Kress & Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Black v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Leon's Shoe Stores, Inc. v. HornsbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Jones v. St. JohnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API