Legal Opinion

Lathrop v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 22, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action brought in the district court for Swift county for possession of certain bridge timber and piles of the value of $250. Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on the report of S. H. Hudson, Esq., referee.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Action of claim and delivery, plaintiffs alleging ownership of certain bridge timber and oak piling, the defendant justifying as an officer holding a writ of. attachment, by virtue of which he had seized and attached the property as that of J. H. Clough, one of the defendants named in the writ. The only question in the ease was whether the attached property had been sold, before the seizure, to plaintiffs by Clough, and with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud his creditors. On this question, the referee w'ho tried the case found in plaintiffs’ favor. _ They contend the transaction through…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Webster v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Camp v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  3. Kingsley v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885
  4. Culver v. BanningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  5. Tunell v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dysart Savings Bank v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Peycke Bros. v. HazenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API