Dysart Savings Bank v. Weinstein
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Tama District Court. — Hon. 0. B. Bradshaw, Judge. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The defendant, Weinstein, became indebted to the plaintiff bank and absconded. Thereafter said plaintiff sued out an attachment for the collection of its claim, and caused the same to be levied on a large mass of scrap iron lying upon the railroad right of way in the town of Dysart on the theory that said iron was the property of Weinstein, and subject to levy at the suit of his creditors. Soon after said levy, Dan Dally intervened in the attachment proceeding, claiming to be the owner of the iron from a date prior to the levy of the writ, and asking that said levy be discharged. In…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thomas v. HillhouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Brown v. WadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Ingalls v. HerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- King v. Wallace Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Stewart & Brown v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alsco Iowa, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Smith v. BloomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Third Missionary Baptist Church of Davenport v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Wilson v. KelsoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Cownie v. Local Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.