Legal Opinion

Webster v. Anderson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1880PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Mecosta. Trover. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The only question in this case is whether a sale of certain hogs by one Hooper to n Anderson was *555effectual to transfer the title as against a subsequent levy upon them made by Webster by virtue of an execution against Hooper.

The facts as found by the circuit judge are that in October, 1877, Anderson was at work in Hooper’s employ on a farm; that Hooper then owed him $100; that Anderson requested Hooper to pay him, and it was agreed between them that the latter should transfer to him 20 hogs then on his place, with others, at the price of $96, and that Anderson should receive them at that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adams Mining Co. v. SenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Shaul v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Godkin v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Haken v. SchefflerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. James Mack Co. v. Bear River Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API