Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Kryger
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1913PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of tbe District Court, Kidder County; Winchester, J.
1Opinion of the CourtRise, J.
Respondent moves for a dismissal of this appeal upon the following grounds:
“1st. That no statement of the errors of law complained of or specifi*79cation of insufficient evidence was served witb tbe notice of appeal as required by paragraph 4, chapter 131, Session Laws of 1913.
“2d. There has been inexcusable delay on the part of appellant in causing a statement of the case to be settled, and in taking said appeal, more than two terms of this court having passed since the entry of judgment in the district court on July 9, 1912, and no statement having been proposed or submitted.
“3d. .The said…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Gautier v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1846
- Odum v. GarnerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Merchants National Bank v. BraithwaiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Rankin v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Leu v. MontgomeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Wilson v. KrygerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- City of Plankinton v. KiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Manikowske v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.