Legal Opinion

Crider v. Zurich Insurance

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 1, 1965No. 116Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

380 U.S. 39 (1965)

CRIDER

v.

ZURICH INSURANCE CO.

No. 116.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 19, 1965.

Decided March 1, 1965.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

Max C. Pope, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was J. Terry Huffstutler.

Foster Etheredge argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · DouglasJustice Douglas

Petitioner, a resident of Alabama and employed there by Lawler Construction Co., Inc., a Georgia corporation. was injured. Both he and Lawler were under Georgia's Workmen's Compensation Act at the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Minnesota v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API