Legal Opinion

Hochalter v. City of Gillette

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2005No. 05-15PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[11] The city of Gillette (Gillette) adopted a Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual which indicated Gillette would provide certain health and life insurance benefits to long-term employees following retirement. In 20083, Gillette adopted a revised manual which provided a limited amount of money to an irrevocable trust to fund the insurance benefits to those qualified employees and eliminated some benefits previously offered. Ten employees (Employees) filed a class action against Gillette claiming it was bound by the terms of the first manual. They sought a declaratory…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Ass'n v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Matter of Paternity of JRWWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Utah Construction Co. v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Gillette v. Hladky Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. McCann v. City of CodyWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Chester Loyde Bird v. Wyoming Board of Parole, Daniel M. Fetsco, Executive Director, and Wyoming Department of Corrections, Robert O. Lampert, DirectorWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Excel Construction, Inc. v. Town of LovellWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Bentley v. DIRECTOR OF OFFICE STATE LANDSWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API