Legal Opinion
Utah Construction Co. v. State Highway Commission
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 1933No. 1773PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KiMball, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff, Utah Construction Company, in its action against defendant, State Highway Commission of Wyoming, seeks to obtain a judgment for a large sum claimed as the balance due for performance of a highway construction contract. The appeal is by the plaintiff from a judgment against it after its election to stand on its last amended petition to which, a demurrer had been sustained.
Plaintiff’s claim was first made the subject of an action in the Federal District Court. That action was dismissed when it was decided that it in effect was a suit against the state. 278…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Beers Ex Rel. Platenius v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Finn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Highway Comm. of Wyoming v. Utah Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Joe Harold Williams v. Lloyd Eaton, as Football Coach of the University of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Worthington v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Price v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
- Awe Ex Rel. Awe v. University of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Brown v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.