Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Mintz

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1993No. 92-SP-222Published

1ConcurrenceFerren, Associate Judge

I join the court’s opinion but write separately to place this decision in its broader context.

Our caselaw development as to supervised probation in reciprocal discipline cases has not been entirely consistent. In at least one reciprocal discipline case, this court imposed the discipline ordered by the other jurisdiction, including supervision by a “probation monitor” for four years after completion of a one-year suspension. See In re Chadwick, 585 A.2d 798, modified, 591 A.2d 837 (D.C.1991). The monitoring, however, was limited to that conducted in California, where the respondent had his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In Re PeekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. In Re ReidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. In Re LarsenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API