Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Ruble

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Jackson County.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Waldo, J.:

The complaint alleges that on the first day of July, 1878, the respondent bound himself by an agreement in writing to convey to I. N. Muncy, for $30,000, to be paid in installments of $10,000 in two weeks, two months and four months, seven mining claims in Jackson county, Oregon.

The respondent owned but one of these claims, but contracts to convey to him are alleged to have existed between him and the owners. Some of these contracts are shown to have been verbal, and in the others the writings have not been produced. They must, therefore, all be held to stand on the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Purcell v. MinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Semmes v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  4. Ahrend v. OdiorneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. WoodburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RathieOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Moore v. ShofnerOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. In re Apportionment of Indebtedness between Fremont & Big Horn CountiesWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Frame v. SliterOregon Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API