Legal Opinion

McCormick v. McCormick

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1931No. 23113PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

This action arises upon a petition to set aside certain deeds executed by Richard McCor mick, the husband of Emma 0. McCormick, the plaintiff, to his son by a former marriage, about three weeks prior to his marriage to Emma 0. McCormick, upon the ground that the deeds were executed in fraud of the wife’s dower rights. The amended petition prayed “that said deeds and the conveyances intended thereby, insofar as they affect her dower in said real estate, be set aside, and that plaintiff be decreed to have an inchoate right of dower in said real estate during the life of plaintiff and defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Danforth v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
  2. Kiriakis v. FountasOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bishop v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Maxwell v. AwtreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. Wildeman v. WildemanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morad v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. E. W. Bliss Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957
  3. Gelman v. Holland Furnace Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. State, Ex Rel. Squire v. PospisilOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. State ex rel. Continental Casualty Co. v. BirrellOhio Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API