Legal Opinion

Gelman v. Holland Furnace Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HUNSICKER, J.

In this appeal on questions of law and fact, the appellant (plaintiff below), Sarah Gelman, says- that she entered into a written lease with the appellee (defendant below), Holland Furnace Co., a corporation, whose principal place of business is in Holland, Michigan.

Appellant further alleges that: she understood the lease to be for one year, and, inasmuch as she is unable to read the English language, she did not know that there had been inserted in the lease a privilege to the appellee company of extending the lease for five successive periods of one year each; said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wineburgh v. Toledo Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Lyons v. ChapmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. McCormick v. McCormickOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hodesh v. HallermanOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Duhme v. MehnerHamilton Circuit Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frank v. FlynnOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Jaffe v. Patterson Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API