Legal Opinion

Kiriakis v. Fountas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1924No. 18102PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The controlling question to be determined herein is whether or not the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the appeal from the court of common pleas, on the ground that the case was not appealable by reason of the fact that there was no transcript of the evidence nor bill of exceptions taken before the referee on file in the appellate court.

Two major points arise in the consideration of this question: The first is whether the present action is a chancery case and in its nature appeal-able. The second is whether an action loses its chancery nature by reason of a rule of the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frank v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Johnston & Grommett Bros. v. Bunn & MonteiroSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. LessovitzOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Lincoln Properties, Inc. v. GoldslagerOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Morad v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. W. C. McBride, Inc. v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Lust v. Farmers' Bank & Savings Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API