Legal Opinion
McCormack v. Rutland Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Rutland Regional Medical Center and DiMuzio
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 2, 2013No. 2012-104PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. Plaintiffs appeal the superior court’s denial of their motion for a new trial based on allegations of juror bias. The issues presented are whether (1) plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was timely, (2) the trial court erred in denying the motion under the test for juror bias set forth in In re Nash, 158 Vt. 458, 614 A.2d 367 (1991), and (3) the trial court erred in denying the motion under the doctrine of implied bias. We affirm.
¶ 2. The undisputed facts may be summarized as follows and additional relevant facts are stated as necessary. In April 2008, plaintiffs Gilbert McCormack and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Richard Clinton AllsupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Adremy Dennis v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cheryl J. Brown v. State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018