Legal Opinion

Moncy v. Planning Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 19, 2001No. 99-P-62PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

The sole issue in this case is whether Bates Lane, laid out by the selectmen of the town of Scituate in 1725 as a “highway,” is a public way under the Subdivision Control Law. If so, then a plan of land depicting a lot with the required frontage under the Scituate zoning law submitted by the plaintiff to the planning board (board) was entitled, to be endorsed “approval under the subdivision control law not required.” The *716board had denied the endorsement based on lack of substantive proof that Bates Lane is a public way as that term is used in G. L. c. 41, § 81L. The plaintiff appealed the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Johnson v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Inhabitants of Cohasset v. MoorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Fenn v. Town of MiddleboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Denham v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barry v. Planning Board of BelchertownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  2. Norberg v. Planning Board of UxbridgeMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010
  3. TOWN OF CONCORD v. NEIL E. RASMUSSEN & OthersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025
  4. TOWN OF CONCORD v. NEIL E. RASMUSSEN & Others.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API