Legal Opinion

Fenn v. Town of Middleborough

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 26, 1979PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought this action to confirm their title to a twenty-one acre parcel of vacant land in Middleborough. Their petition alleged, in part, that the parcel lay at the junction of, and was bounded on two sides by, public ways known as Short Street and Tispaquin Street. The town had to be given notice of the proceeding, both as owner of one of the abutting parcels and because the petition sought determination of the boundaries of the ways mentioned. See G. L. c. 185, §§ 29 and 39. Of those given notice, the town alone filed an appearance. By its answer it conceded…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moffatt v. KennyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Sprow v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. Truc v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Uliasz v. GilletteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. Commonwealth v. CoupeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Perry v. Planning Board of NantucketMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Newburyport Redevelopment Authority v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. Sturdy v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Witteveld v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Patel v. Planning Board of North AndoverMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API