Legal Opinion

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports

Decided April 9, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

Informal Opinion No. 98-15 Emily Pines, Esq. Town Attorney Town of Brookhaven 3233 Route 112 Medford, N Y 11763

Dear Ms. Pines:

You have requested an opinion regarding whether the Town of Brookhaven may require a developer/sponsor of a Planned Retirement Community ("PRC") to provide transportation for PRC residents to off-site shopping and/or medical facilities. In a telephone conversation, you narrowed your opinion request to whether the town may require the developer to include this transportation in its site plan for the development. Thus, your question relates to the permissible scope of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Onge v. DonovanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Holmes v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Pearson v. ShoemakerNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Peckham Industries, Inc. v. RossNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Hill v. Planning Board of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API