Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Shoemaker
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1960PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel W. Eager, J.
We have a petition here in a proceeding instituted pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Ramapo, County of Rockland, New York. The said determination granted, conditionally, the application of the intervenor-respondent for a “ Special Permit” for use as a community recreation area, including a swimming pool, of an 11.2-acre tract situate in a residential use zone in said town.
Determination is annulled and matter remitted to Zoning Board for rehearing and reconsideration. The determination is indefinite and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barry v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Gilbert v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Hopkins v. Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by15 opinions
- St. Onge v. DonovanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Bernstein v. Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- City of New York v. Delafield 246 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- C.B.H. Properties, Inc. v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Hoffay v. TifftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.