Holmes v. Planning Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Titone, J.
On appeal this court must determine the reasonableness of a condition which was imposed by the Planning Board of the Town of New Castle as a requisite of its approval of the site plan submitted by the petitioners. The condition is based on a limited goal plan, entitled the King Street Hill Area Site Plan. The plan is circumscribed in scope and area. Its goal is to provide a partial solution to the problem of traffic congestion on a small section of King Street, the main east-west artery of the Town of New Castle. This goal is to be achieved by using…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Moriarty v. Planning Board of Village of SloatsburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Batch v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Bongiorno v. Planning Board of Inc. VillageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- International Innovative Technology Group Corp. v. Planning Board of Town of WoodburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Castle Properties Co. v. AckersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.