Legal Opinion

Morris v. Caulk

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 1, 1914No. 3755PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Brror from County Court, Caddo County; Action between Wesley Morris and H. F. Caulk. From the judgment, Morris brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The defendant in error in the above styled cause filed in this court on October 28, 1914, a motion to dismiss the appeal, alleging three specific reasons therefor, among them the following:

“Second. The case-made does not contain an order overruling the motion for new trial.
“Third. The case-made was not served within three days after the motion for new trial purports to have been overruled, and contains no order extending the time to make and serve a case-made beyond the statutory three days, and this court has no jurisdiction to review the errors alleged.”

We have examined…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Gish, Brook & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Ellis v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Fife v. CornelousSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Ford v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Nelson v. Pittsburg Mortgage Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lillard v. MeisbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Aycock v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. City of Tulsa v. KaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. In Re GarlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API