People v. Cochran
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
Penal Code section 311.4 proscribes employing a minor to produce child pornography. (Further statutory references are to the Penal Code.) Subdivision (b) of that section provides for a longer prison sentence than otherwise if the defendant makes the pornography “for commercial purposes.” We granted review to decide whether producing child pornography and posting it on the Internet in order to induce others similarly to trade such pornography on the Internet (without making a monetary profit), satisfies the statute’s commercial requirement. A major reason for providing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Siderman de Blake v. Republic of ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. ValladoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Jordan v. TashiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. LicasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. SkilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. J.L.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Absher v. AutoZone, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Levin v. United Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.