Legal Opinion

Marvin Glass & Associates v. De Luxe Topper Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 25, 1967No. 67 Civ. 722PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BONSAL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Marvin Glass & Associates (Glass), the owner, of Patent No. 3,298,-692, “Game With Action Producing Components” (the patent), issued on January 17, 1967, and plaintiff Ideal Toy Corporation (Ideal), the exclusive licensee from Glass, sue the defendants, De Luxe Topper Corporation and De Luxe Reading Corporation, alleging that the game “Silly Safari,” sold by the defendants, infringes the patent. The game “Mouse Trap” is manufactured and sold by Ideal pursuant to its exclusive license under the patent.

Defendants move pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Williams Mfg. Co. v. United Shoe MacH. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  5. Lever Bros. Co. v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Xerox Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  2. Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Klimsch-Repro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Lyle/Carlstrom Associates, Inc. v. Manhattan Store Interiors, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API