Legal Opinion

Kroll v. Cozen O'Connor PC

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 26, 2020No. 1:19-cv-03919Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RABBI STANLEY KROLL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 19 C 3919 ) COZEN O’CONNOR, a Pennsylvania ) Judge John Z. Lee Professional Corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In this removed case, Rabbi Stanley Kroll has sued the law firm of Cozen O’Connor (“Cozen”) for legal malpractice, aiding and abetting fraud, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and fraudulent concealment. Cozen has moved to dismiss the complaint [15]. For the reasons provided below, Cozen’s motion is granted in part…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API