Legal Opinion
Schiesel v. S. Z. Poli Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 16, 1928PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The case was tried to the jury. The plaintiff offered evidence to prove: That he, from October, 1923, to October, 1925, conducted a business in women’s and children’s clothing in a store adjoining the defendant’s theatre and separated from it upon its easterly side by a brick wall which was the westerly side of the lobby of the theatre. During plaintiff’s occupancy of this store for a year and up to October 1st, 1924, no steam or water escaped into his store causing damage to his stock of goods. The store was heated by an ordinary coal stove and a gas heater, upon which he kept a small vessel…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alfred Atmore Pope Foundation, Inc. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Stebel v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Crotty v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Smith v. HausdorfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Town of East Granby v. Hartford Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jump v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Briganti v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Heslin v. MaloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Ryan v. George L. Lilley Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. BunceWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.