Legal Opinion

State v. Barber

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 31, 1977PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.

The defendant, Jerome Barber, was charged with rape by forcible compulsion, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (1). He was tried to a jury and found guilty. He has appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict, alleging that he was denied adequate assistance of counsel. There is no claim of error on the part of the court in its charge or in its conduct of the trial.

The present case illustrates the difficulty of determining adequacy of counsel on a direct appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict rather than on a motion for a new trial or a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Reece v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. State v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. State v. ScielzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API