Seidel v. Nicollet Avenue Properties Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from the order denying a new trial after a directed verdict in defendant’s favor.
Plaintiff sued to recover damages for personal injuries received when at work repairing the elevator doors in defendant’s building, located on Nicollet avenue in the city of Minneapolis. The answer set up as a defense that plaintiff and his employer, the Flour City Ornamental Iron Company, and the defendant and its employes operating its elevators were all under 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, c. 23A, part II, known as the workmen’s compensation act, and that plaintiff had elected to avail…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rasmussen v. George Benz & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Taylor v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Brown Sheet Iron & Steel Co. v. Brown Steel Tank Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Anderson v. Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gleason v. GearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Schleicher v. Lunda Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. FrechetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Tevoght v. PolsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- French v. ChristnerOregon Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.