Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tevoght v. Polson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1939No. 31,965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

I dissent. In my opinion the situation is nearly the same as in Seidel v. Nicollet Ave. Properties Corp. 202 Minn. 569,279 N.W. 570. All were under the compensation act, and the two employers here concerned were upon the premises where each must perform his work in the presence of the other, the same as subcontractors in the erection of a building.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seidel v. Nicollet Avenue Properties Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tevoght v. PolsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939