Legal Opinion · Dissent
Tevoght v. Polson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 5, 1939No. 31,965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Dissent
I dissent. In my opinion the situation is nearly the same as in Seidel v. Nicollet Ave. Properties Corp. 202 Minn. 569,279 N.W. 570. All were under the compensation act, and the two employers here concerned were upon the premises where each must perform his work in the presence of the other, the same as subcontractors in the erection of a building.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Seidel v. Nicollet Avenue Properties Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tevoght v. PolsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939