Legal Opinion

Tauchert v. Ritz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1995No. 65299PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Judge.

William Tauehert appeals from the jury-verdict of his personal injury action. The jury found Russell Ritz, the defendant, to be 28% at fault and Tauehert to be 72% at fault, but awarded zero damages to Tauehert.

We review the facts in a light most favorable to the verdict. Tauehert, at the time of the accident, had been an elevator mechanic apprentice at Westinghouse Elevator Company for three months. While on the project at which he was injured, he worked under the supervision of Ritz, an elevator mechanic. Before coming to work at Westinghouse, Tauehert had held…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Douglass v. SafireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. Hicks v. Graves Truck Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Skyway Aviation, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Phillips v. LivelyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Williams v. BaileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Emery v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Gerrish v. SavardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Duren v. Union Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Thompson v. MarlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Thompson v. MarlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API