Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Duncan

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

FROM DAYIDSON Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County —John Allisoh, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

This cause is a general creditors ’ proceeding to wind up The Duncan, a hotel corporation, and the questions to he determined arise on the claim of the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company against the insolvent company and Oliver J. Timothy, as guarantor for it.

The Duncan, as maker, executed a mortgage note for $60,000 to the ¿Life Insurance Company which contained in its body, the following stipulation respecting attorneys ’ fees:

“It is stipulated that if this note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, has to be sued upon, or if litigation arises in the course of its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Houston National Bank v. WoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hubbard v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Clark v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hall v. PrattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Riverside Milling & Power Co. v. Bank of CartersvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. EAC Credit Corporation v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Merrimon v. ParkeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Cullum v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. EAC Credit Corporation v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Dole v. WadeTennessee Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API