Brock v. Kepl
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Madsen, J.
Petitioner Teresa Brock challenges the Court of Appeals’ decision reversing the trial court’s summary judgment determining the paternity of her two boys. Michael Kepi, the biological father, signed a paternity affidavit for the older child but not for the younger child. The trial court determined that the biological father was the legal (natural) father for both boys. The Court of Appeals reversed, agreeing with the biological father that, as a matter of law, the former artificial insemination statute shielded him from legal fatherhood status with regard to both boys. At issue is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Amunrud v. Board of AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Custody of ShieldsWashington Supreme Court · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.