Moore v. Exelby
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). At the outset it may be said that it is well settled that a complete contract for the sale of lands binding under the statute of frauds may be gathered from letters between the parties relating to the subject-matter of the contract and so connected with each other that they may be fairly said to constitute one paper relating to the contract. In order to be sufficient, the letters relied upon must by reference to each other disclose every material part of a valid contract and must be signed by the party sought to be charged. Jn other words, the letters must…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Waring v. . AyresNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Lick v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- Dollar v. KnightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- McCurry v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ray v. WoosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Hendrickson v. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Brown v. Arkansas Central Power Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Coffman v. Citizens' Loan & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Faulkner v. WoodardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.